This Journal is user for the Committee on Publication Ethics

Please browse the recommendations below then visit the Journal’s distribution web site to upload your manuscript. Take note that manuscripts perhaps maybe perhaps not conforming to these tips are came back.

Just manuscripts of enough quality that meet up with the aims and range of Adaptive Behavior would be evaluated.

There are not any charges payable to submit or publish in this log.

Included in the submission procedure you will end up expected to justify which you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you that you are submitting your original work.

1. What do we publish?

1.1 Aims & Scope

Before publishing your manuscript to Adaptive Behavior, please ensure you’ve got read the Aims & Scope.

1.2 Article Kinds

  • Articles – Manuscripts reporting initial research, typically containing between 6,000 and 12,000 terms.
  • Reviews – Major overviews of domain names of intellectual inquiry, typically containing a lot more than 12,000 words.
  • Commentaries – severely brief communications responding to formerly posted articles, typically containing under 500 words.
  • Views – Evaluations of current research, hypotheses, and future styles, typically under 2,000 terms.
  • Quick communications – detailing research that is original, typically containing under 2,000 terms.
  • Book reviews – brief communications answering formerly posted publications, typically under 2,000 terms.
  • Reports – Evaluations of seminars, workshops, along with other gatherings that are intellectual typically under 2,000 terms.

1.3 Composing your paper

The SAGE Author Gateway has some basic advice and on the best way to get posted, plus links to help resources.

1.3.1 Create your article discoverable

Whenever composing your paper, think of how it can be made by you discoverable. The name, keywords and abstract are fundamental to ensuring visitors find your article through the search engines such as for example Google. For information and guidance on just how better to title your article, write your abstract and choose your keywords, check out this page on the Gateway: How to assist visitors Find Your Article on line.

2. Editorial policies

2.1 Peer review policy

Adaptive Behavior operates under the standard single-blind reviewing policy where the reviewer’s title is often hidden through the submitting writer.

All manuscripts are evaluated initially by certainly one of the Editors and only those documents that meet up with the clinical and editorial criteria for the log, and fit in the aims and range regarding the journal, is sent for peer review. Generally speaking, reviews from at the very least two separate referees are needed.

Included in the distribution procedure you’ll be expected to produce the true names of 3 peers whom might be contacted 20% off to review your manuscript. Suggested reviewers should really be specialists in their industries and may have the ability to offer an assessment that is objective of manuscript. Please be aware of any disputes of great interest whenever reviewers that are recommending. Types of disputes of great interest include ( but they are not restricted to) the below:

  • The reviewer needs no knowledge that is prior of distribution
  • The reviewer must not have recently collaborated with some of the writers
  • Reviewer nominees through the institution that is same some of the authors are not allowed

Please be aware that the Editors aren’t obliged to invite any reviewers that are recommended/opposed evaluate your manuscript.

2.2 Authorship

Documents should simply be submitted for consideration once permission is written by all authors that are contributing. Those papers that are submitting carefully make sure that dozens of whose work contributed to your paper are known as contributing writers.
record of writers includes dozens of who is able to legitimately claim authorship. That is dozens of who:

(i) produced significant contribution to the style or design of this work; or acquisition, analysis or interpretation of information,

(ii) Drafted the content or revised it critically for essential intellectual content,

(iii) Approved the variation become posted,

(iv) Each writer needs to have participated adequately within the strive to simply just just take responsibility that is public appropriate portions for the content.

Writers should meet with the conditions out of all the points above. Whenever a big, multicentre team has carried out the task, the team should determine the people who accept direct obligation for the manuscript. These people should completely qualify for authorship.

Acquisition of funding, number of information, or supervision that is general of research team alone will not constitute authorship, although all contributors that do maybe not meet the requirements for authorship must certanly be placed in the Acknowledgments area. Please relate to the Overseas Committee of health Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship recommendations to learn more about authorship.

2.3 Acknowledgements

All contributors that do perhaps maybe not meet the requirements for authorship must be placed in an Acknowledgements area. Samples of those that could be recognized include someone who offered solely technical assistance, or a division seat whom offered just support that is general.

2.3.1 assistance that is writing

People who offered assistance that is writing e.g. from a professional communications business, try not to qualify as authors and thus should always be contained in the Acknowledgements area. Writers must reveal any writing assistance – like the individual’s name, business and amount of input – and determine the entity that taken care of this support.

It’s not essential to reveal utilization of language polishing solutions.

Any acknowledgements should appear first during the end of the article ahead of your Declaration of Conflicting passions (if relevant), any records as well as your sources.

2.4 Funding

Adaptive Behavior requires all authors to acknowledge their financing in a regular fashion under a split heading. Please go to the Funding Acknowledgements web web web page from the SAGE Journal Author Gateway to ensure the structure of this acknowledgment text in the case of money, or declare that: This research received no grant that is specific any capital agency when you look at the general general public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

2.5 Declaration of conflicting passions

It will be the policy of Adaptive Behavior to require a statement of conflicting passions from all writers allowing a declaration to be carried inside the paginated pages of all of the posted articles.

Please make sure a ‘Declaration of Conflicting passions’ statement is roofed in the final end of one’s manuscript, after any acknowledgements and before the sources. If no conflict exists, please suggest that ‘The Author(s) declare(s) that there’s no conflict of interest’. For assistance with conflict of interest statements, please look at ICMJE guidelines here.

2.6 Analysis Data

At SAGE we have been invested in openness that is facilitating transparency and reproducibility of research. Where appropriate, Adaptive Behavior encourages writers to fairly share their research information in a suitable general public repository subject to ethical factors and where information is included, to incorporate a information accessibility statement inside their manuscript file. Writers must also follow information citation axioms. To get more information please look at the extensive research information Sharing Policies, which include information regarding SAGE’s partnership aided by the information repository Figshare.